Audit market concentration for the segments of listed and non-listed auditees in Slovenia (p.31-49) |
|
by |
|
Maja Zaman Groff, Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana, Slovenia |
Amela Salihovi, Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana, Slovenia |
|
Keywords : Auditing, Concentration, Listed companies, Non-listed companies, Slovenia |
|
JEL classification : M42, M48, D40 |
|
|
Abstract |
High audit market concentration in the European Union (EU), especially in the segment of public interest companies (PIEs), was highlighted by the European Commission (EC) as problematic in the Green Paper on Audit Policy. We find that the market for the segment of listed companies is highly concentrated in Slovenia whereas in the segment of non-listed companies the concentration is relatively low. Given the observed trend of continuing decline in concentration level for non-listed companies and the overall observation of the differences between the two segments we conclude that the decision of the EC to prepare a separate, more stringent set of rules for the statutory audits of PIEs was justified. However, for proper implementation of national legislation for audits of non-PIEs (including mandatory audit firm rotation and prohibition of non-audit services) attention should also be placed on the effect of these measures on audit quality. |
|
The economic crisis and industrial relations: Greece and Romania in comparison (p.51-77) |
|
by |
|
George Economakis, Department of Business Administration, University of Patras |
Valeriu Frunzaru, College of Communication and Public Relations, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration |
Ioannis Zisimopoulos, Department of Business Administration, University of Patras |
|
Keywords : Industrial Relations, Collective Bargaining, Economic Crisis, Greece, Romania |
|
JEL classification : J52, J53 |
|
|
Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to investigate, in a comparative framework, the impact of the adjustment programs (Memoranda) in Greece and Romania, in the context of the global economic crisis. In Greece the crisis emerged as a twin (trade and fiscal) deficits crisis and in Romania it has taken the form of a public debt crisis. As a result, in Greece the austerity policy has directly affected employees both in private and public sectors, while in Romania it has focused in public servants. The decentralization of the collective bargaining system is a common feature in both countries. In Greece, decentralization occurs through the complete undermining of sectoral collective bargaining (decentralized decentralization), while in Romania through the weakening of the sectoral collective bargaining in favour of collective bargaining at enterprise level. The structure of employment in both countries determines the outcome of the process of decentralization. |
|
"It won't happen to me": Is there a link between trust and optimism?
(p.79-98) |
|
by |
|
Yuri V. Avtonomov, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow |
Elizaveta T. Elizarova, International College of Economics and Finance, Moscow |
|
Keywords : Trust, Trustworthiness, Expectations, Experiment, Optimism bias |
|
JEL classification : D84, Z13 |
|
|
Abstract |
The importance of trust in facilitating economic interactions and its contribution to social welfare gives economists ample reasons to study trust. However, despite a long history of experimental studies of trust, its determinants are still not completely clear. We report evidence from an experimental study which suggests the existence of an optimism bias: players expect their partners to be more trustworthy than the average member of the population. This bias was positively and statistically significantly related to players' decision to trust. Our data also indicates a positive relation between the player's decision to trust and her expectations about the overall trust level: players who trusted their partners also believed that other players would trust more often. |
|
Successive local government institutional reforms in Greece: From regionalization to regionalism? (p.99-131) |
|
by |
|
Panos Ioannidis, Department of Economics, Democritus University |
|
Keywords : Regionalism, Regionalization, Local Government, Institutional Reforms, Kallikrates |
|
JEL classification : R50, H77, R58 |
|
|
Abstract |
The system of local government in Greece incurred significant alterations in the last years. Kapodistrias and Kallikrates reforms generated new conditions for regional policy. The aim of this paper is to study the course of local government reforms in Greece in terms of regionalization and regionalism. It is argued that the successive implementation of Kapodistrias and Kallikrates reform are crucial steps from regionalization to regionalism. Methodology is based on a primary research that took place in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace (NUTS II). A closed type questionnaire was distributed in local actors. Results demonstrate that operation of local/regional governments and intraregional cooperation improved significantly by the reforms. Non institutional partners assessed more substantially the provisions of Kapodistrias and Kallikrates reform than institutional partners did. A more interactive framework is required in order local actors of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace to advance the process from regionalization to regionalism. |
|